No. The test was super-simple. Just send one large message and then consume
it.


Justin

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:57 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It did not involved paging ?
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:07 AM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I recreated this exception with a very simple test-case. I took the
> > consumer code pasted earlier in the thread and just added a producer
> > sending a large message. I lowered the minLargeMessageSize to make it
> > faster. I thought I still had that code laying around somewhere, but I
> > can't find it at the moment.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 9:03 AM Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have seen (and fixed) cases where the large message file is gone.  I
> > > would need a reproducer creating the issue from scratch (send and
> > consume)
> > >
> > > Typically it could be associated with paging ?  Did you have the
> > > destination in page mode ?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:53 PM Tim Jones <t...@abcwxy.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The client code below the stack trace - will reproduce it  - the
> > > > msg.getDataBuffer() inside the handler of that code will trigger it
> > when
> > > a
> > > > large message is sent to the address.  The exception in question
> > > > (IndexOutOfBoundsException) is being caught in line 249 of the apache
> > > > CoreMessage code... and turned into a logged warning on line 250.
> The
> > > > CoreMessage code then returns the buffer from getReadOnlyBuffer()
> > (which
> > > > appears to be fine from a quick survey - data also seems to be
> > preserved
> > > > and accessible from client code) - it is just not clear what the
> intent
> > > is
> > > > if the exception code is executed... is it a "don't worry about it" -
> > or
> > > a
> > > > "something is wrong here" and I should concern myself with something?
> > > (the
> > > > warning level is making me believe that it is more than a "don't
> worry
> > > > about it" - but the fact that the exception was caught and a valid
> > buffer
> > > > is returned makes me think it is just a fallback for the other
> choices
> > of
> > > > buffers - and I should not worry about it?).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for any insight you may have....
> > > >
> > > > logged warning from the caught exception is:
> > > >
> > > > 16:26:50.923 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] WARN
> > > > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.message.impl.CoreMessage -
> > > readerIndex(4)
> > > > + length(270740) exceeds writerIndex(4):
> > > > UnpooledByteBufAllocator$InstrumentedUnpooledUnsafeHeapByteBuf(ridx:
> 4,
> > > > widx: 4, cap: 270740)
> > > > java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: readerIndex(4) + length(270740)
> > > > exceeds writerIndex(4):
> > > > UnpooledByteBufAllocator$InstrumentedUnpooledUnsafeHeapByteBuf(ridx:
> 4,
> > > > widx: 4, cap: 270740)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.checkReadableBytes0(AbstractByteBuf.java:1442)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.checkReadableBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:1428)
> > > > at
> io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.readBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:937)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientMessageImpl$DecodingContext.readInto(ClientMessageImpl.java:407)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.message.impl.CoreMessage.getLargeMessageBuffer(CoreMessage.java:264)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.message.impl.CoreMessage.getDataBuffer(CoreMessage.java:241)
> > > > at io.m45.sart.Main.lambda$main$0(Main.java:57)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl.callOnMessage(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1013)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl$Runner.run(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1133)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:42)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:31)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.ProcessorBase.executePendingTasks(ProcessorBase.java:65)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.ActiveMQThreadFactory$1.run(ActiveMQThreadFactory.java:118)
> > > > 16:26:50.924 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-netty-threads)] DEBUG
> > > > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl -
> > Sending
> > > > 65962 from flow-control
> > > >
> > > > Simple Client Code below:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > public class Main {
> > > >
> > > >     private final static String ACCEPTOR = "tcp://localhost:9322";
> > > >     private final static String QUEUE="service.images.dev::
> > > > service.images.dev";
> > > >
> > > >     public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
> > > >
> > > >         final String username = null;
> > > >         final String password = null;
> > > >
> > > >         var serverLocator = ActiveMQClient
> > > >                 .createServerLocator(ACCEPTOR)
> > > >                 .setBlockOnDurableSend(true)
> > > >                 .setBlockOnNonDurableSend(true);
> > > >
> > > >         final var sessionFactory =
> > serverLocator.createSessionFactory();
> > > >
> > > >         final var xa = false;
> > > >         final var autoCommitSends = true;
> > > >         final var autoCommitAcks = true;
> > > >         final var ackBatchSize = serverLocator.getAckBatchSize();
> > > >         final var preAcknowledge = serverLocator.isPreAcknowledge();
> > > >         final var clientSession = sessionFactory.createSession(
> > > >                 username,
> > > >                 password,
> > > >                 xa,
> > > >                 autoCommitSends,
> > > >                 autoCommitAcks,
> > > >                 preAcknowledge,
> > > >                 ackBatchSize
> > > >         );
> > > >
> > > >         var queueQueryResult =
> > > > clientSession.queueQuery(SimpleString.toSimpleString(QUEUE));
> > > >         if (!queueQueryResult.isExists()) {
> > > >             clientSession.createQueue(_ServiceQueueConfiguration(new
> > > > SimpleString(QUEUE)));
> > > >         }
> > > >
> > > >         final var consumer = clientSession.createConsumer(QUEUE);
> > > >
> > > >         clientSession.start();
> > > >
> > > >         consumer.setMessageHandler((msg) -> {
> > > >
> > > >             System.out.println("Received: "+msg.getBodySize());
> > > >             msg.getDataBuffer();
> > > >
> > > >         });
> > > >
> > > >         while(true) {
> > > >             Thread.sleep(1000);
> > > >         }
> > > >
> > > >     }
> > > >
> > > >     private static QueueConfiguration
> > > > _ServiceQueueConfiguration(SimpleString queueName) {
> > > >         final var config = new QueueConfiguration(queueName);
> > > >         config.setMaxConsumers(1);
> > > >         config.setPurgeOnNoConsumers(false);
> > > >         config.setDurable(false);
> > > >         config.setAutoDelete(false);
> > > >         config.setRoutingType(RoutingType.MULTICAST);
> > > >         return config;
> > > >     }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 2:28 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Typically an IndexOutOfBoundsException indicates a bug. Do you
> have a
> > > way
> > > > > to reproduce this?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Justin
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:17 PM Tim Jones <t...@abcwxy.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This seems to appear on larger messages only - I am getting a
> > warning
> > > > > when
> > > > > > calling getDataBuffer (2.20.0 Artemis Client).  Curious if there
> is
> > > > > > something I may be missing - or if this is completely ignorable?
> > > > Thanks -
> > > > > > Tim
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2022-02-17T21:06:11,908+01:00 [Thread-2
> > > > (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)]
> > > > > > WARN o.a.a.a.c.m.i.CoreMessage [Thread-2
> > > > > (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)]
> > > > > > readerIndex(270740) + length(270740) exceeds writerIndex(271572):
> > > > > >
> > UnpooledByteBufAllocator$InstrumentedUnpooledUnsafeHeapByteBuf(ridx:
> > > > > > 270740, widx: 271572, cap: 271572)
> > > > > > java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: readerIndex(270740) +
> > > > length(270740)
> > > > > > exceeds writerIndex(271572):
> > > > > >
> > UnpooledByteBufAllocator$InstrumentedUnpooledUnsafeHeapByteBuf(ridx:
> > > > > > 270740, widx: 271572, cap: 271572)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.checkReadableBytes0(AbstractByteBuf.java:1442)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.checkReadableBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:1428)
> > > > > > at
> > > io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.readBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:937)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientMessageImpl$DecodingContext.readInto(ClientMessageImpl.java:407)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.message.impl.CoreMessage.getLargeMessageBuffer(CoreMessage.java:264)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.message.impl.CoreMessage.getDataBuffer(CoreMessage.java:241)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Reply via email to