Thanks for this insight. Would by any chance Artemis offer better options for HA ?
Yannick -----Original Message----- From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, 8 June 2022 18:38 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Classic HA without SAN > It seems I'm down to Master/Slave with either something like GFS2 (so > a RHEL Cluster) or JDBC with MySQL (or any other db) to ensure that no messages are lost if we lose an ESX in our VMWare cluster. It sounds to me like you've got a good handle on your options. Justin On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:23 AM Carbonneaux Yannick < yannick.carbonne...@skyguide.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > We are planning the deployment of an ActiveMQ Classic cluster and I am > looking for the best way to implement HA in a VMWare environment on > RHEL OS without a SAN. > It seems I'm down to Master/Slave with either something like GFS2 (so > a RHEL Cluster) or JDBC with MySQL (or any other db) to ensure that no > messages are lost if we lose an ESX in our VMWare cluster. > > Are there any recommendations on how to implement HA in this context? > Performance is not really problematic today... but might in a near future. > > Thanks for your help, > > ___ > Yannick Carbonneaux > >
