Someone could make arguments on keeping the PDF or the other formats as an offline way to read it or for easier searching.
But the world is so connected now that I think in these days it’s not as cool as it was when we first did years ago. Having said that if people were actually using it I would put an effort to keeping it. But right now it feels a waste of time. An easy way to answer this would be by checking web site traffic. Does anyone know how to access that ? On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 7:21 PM Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would think the HTML pages for Artemis/5.x are really the only versions > used but I am curious to see if any users here chime in and say otherwise. > HTML is pretty nice as you can just link to the latest docs and is standard > for most projects. I don't know of too many other Open source projects that > distribute docs other than through HTML on the web page or through Github > and markdown, etc. > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:31 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I wonder if anyone is using those formats? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 12:58 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Currently as part of the release process for Artemis we build docs in > > these > > > formats: > > > - HTML > > > - PDF > > > - EPUB > > > - MOBI > > > > > > I think we should only build docs in HTML and stop building them in > PDF, > > > EPUB, & MOBI. Building the extra formats adds a surprising overhead to > > the > > > release process, and I don't think they are useful enough to warrant > the > > > effort. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > P.S. This started out on the dev list, but I moved it to the users list > > to > > > get a feel for what users think about these docs. > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > -- Clebert Suconic
