Hi,
Should it be possible to use any of the new resource adapters
activemq-rar-5.18.3.rar or activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar on a Jakarta EE 10 server?
I did a simple test by placing the files in the deployments directory on a
Wildfly 28 server (since that is how the resource adapter is deployed on my
older Wildfly server) but I got the following errors:
2023-11-21 10:08:21,890 INFO [org.jboss.as.server.deployment] (MSC service
thread 1-4) WFLYSRV0027: Starting deployment of "activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar"
(runtime-name: "activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar")
2023-11-21 10:08:23,425 ERROR [org.jboss.msc.service.fail] (MSC service thread
1-2) MSC000001: Failed to start service
jboss.deployment.unit."activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar".PARSE:
org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service
jboss.deployment.unit."activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar".PARSE: WFLYSRV0153: Failed to
process phase PARSE of deployment "activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar"
at
org.jboss.as.server@20.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitPhaseService.start(DeploymentUnitPhaseService.java:189)
at
org.jboss.msc@1.5.0.Final//org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.startService(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1590)
at
org.jboss.msc@1.5.0.Final//org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.execute(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1553)
at
org.jboss.msc@1.5.0.Final//org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$ControllerTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1411)
at
org.jboss.threads@2.4.0.Final//org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
at
org.jboss.threads@2.4.0.Final//org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1990)
at
org.jboss.threads@2.4.0.Final//org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1486)
at
org.jboss.threads@2.4.0.Final//org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1377)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitProcessingException:
WFLYJCA0043: Failed to parse service xml
["/content/activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar/META-INF/ra.xml"]
at
org.jboss.as.connector@28.0.0.Final//org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.ra.processors.RaDeploymentParsingProcessor.process(RaDeploymentParsingProcessor.java:123)
at
org.jboss.as.connector@28.0.0.Final//org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.ra.processors.RaDeploymentParsingProcessor.deploy(RaDeploymentParsingProcessor.java:91)
at
org.jboss.as.server@20.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitPhaseService.start(DeploymentUnitPhaseService.java:182)
... 8 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: fullQualifiedName should be one
of jakarta.resource.spi.security.PasswordCredential;
org.ietf.jgss.GSSCredential;jakarta.resource.spi.security.GenericCredential
at
org.jboss.ironjacamar.api@3.0.2.Final//org.jboss.jca.common.api.metadata.spec.CredentialInterfaceEnum.forName(CredentialInterfaceEnum.java:89)
at
org.jboss.ironjacamar.impl@3.0.2.Final//org.jboss.jca.common.metadata.spec.RaParser.parseAuthenticationMechanism(RaParser.java:1451)
at
org.jboss.ironjacamar.impl@3.0.2.Final//org.jboss.jca.common.metadata.spec.RaParser.parseOutboundResourceadapter(RaParser.java:1308)
at
org.jboss.ironjacamar.impl@3.0.2.Final//org.jboss.jca.common.metadata.spec.RaParser.parseResourceAdapter(RaParser.java:868)
at
org.jboss.ironjacamar.impl@3.0.2.Final//org.jboss.jca.common.metadata.spec.RaParser.parseConnector15(RaParser.java:360)
at
org.jboss.ironjacamar.impl@3.0.2.Final//org.jboss.jca.common.metadata.spec.RaParser.parse(RaParser.java:173)
at
org.jboss.ironjacamar.impl@3.0.2.Final//org.jboss.jca.common.metadata.spec.RaParser.parse(RaParser.java:86)
at
org.jboss.as.connector@28.0.0.Final//org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.ra.processors.RaDeploymentParsingProcessor.process(RaDeploymentParsingProcessor.java:114)
... 10 more
When looking inside ra.xml I see several references to javax classes (e.g.
javax.resource.spi.security.PasswordCredential). According to earlier answers,
the next release of ActiveMQ 5.x should have full jakarta support, including
the resource adapter. Is this still true or have there been some change in
planning? Or do I need to do something else to be able to use the resource
adapter?
Regards,
Calle
