It's a formula field (e.g.): /** * @hibernate.property * formula="QUESTION_NUM" */
whose value is set as a result of being a child of a List association: * @hibernate.list-index * column="QUESTION_NUM" * base="1" The @hibernate.property tag does have an "access" parameter which can be set to "field": http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/tags/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll play with it and report back my findings. Thanks, Gary Bryan Noll-2 wrote: > > I would give yourself the setter. I believe Hibernate expects them to > be there out of the box. Plus, how else do you plan on modifying your > instance variables without one? > > Matt Raible wrote: >> I don't know - I've never tried to use XDoclet with field-level >> access. AFAIK, it's not possible to use XDoclet and annotate fields, >> but I could be wrong. >> >> Matt >> >> On 12/20/06, GaryW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> When using "field" level access, do you put the @hibernate.property >>> tag on >>> the field or on the getter? Also, do you need a setter in this case >>> or is >>> that optional since it's setting the field and not the property? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gary >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Hibernate-XDoclet-question-tf2861325s2369.html#a7994967 >>> >>> >>> Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hibernate-XDoclet-question-tf2861325s2369.html#a7998901 Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
