I've created a poll so everyone can vote on their favorite extension.
http://appfuse.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=495 You'll need to create an account and login to vote. To do this, go to View > Account > Sign Up (or login if you already have an account). Thanks! Matt On 1/16/07, Sanjiv Jivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like .html but the problem I've faced with using this extension is that serving static html file with the .html file extension (like documentation, Dojo templates or FckEditor files) becomes very hard to map to not go to the applications MVC controller. I've spent countless number of hours messing with the url-pattern in web.xml without much success. So I usually use .htm for the application extension. Sanjiv On 9/20/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear AppFuse users, > > As many of you likely know, there are a couple of issues with using > the *.html extension with some frameworks in AppFuse. For example, > with WebWork - it loads Dojo template files from a *.html extension. > If you want to use Dojo with WebWork, you have to modify your default > extension. > > http://issues.appfuse.org/browse/APF-431 > > Because of this, we're starting to look at other extensions. I'd > rather use one for all frameworks, rather than the recommended ones > for each framework b/c it allows us to have one security.xml files, > rather than one for each framework. Another option is to use > path-based mapping, for example: > > http://localhost:8080/yourapp/go/users > > Where "/go/*" is the path that front-controller servlet/filters are > mapped to. The only problem with this is stat trackers typically like > to track extensions, and so we'd be unfriendly to those companies who > like to watch their stats. > > Here's a couple thoughts - feel free to add your own suggestions and thoughts: > > 1. *.htm > 2. *.aspx > 3. *.php > 4. *.app > 5. *.a > 6. *.o > 7. *.apf (would help us track AppFuse-based applications, but it's a > pretty ugly extension) > 8. *.em > 9. *.fun > 10. *.page > > I still like *.html the best b/c it doesn't give away the underlying > technology, so *.htm seems like the best option after that. But of > course, I'm open to suggestions. ;-) > > Matt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- http://raibledesigns.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
