Yes, I agree - it's probably easiest to simply copy. As long as an
overridden file won't be replaced this should work just fine. Of course if
there was a way to map the appfuse war in Eclipse as some type of 'pseudo
source directory' that would be great. Appfuse core files could then show up
in Eclipse grayed out and if you would edit the file it would be copied to
your actual directory and be editable. I wonder how difficult it would be to
write an Eclipse plugin for that... hey, I'm not volunteering yet, need to
finish my project first ;-)
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [appfuse-user] appfuse 2.0 only skeleton?
On 1/26/07, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, if you override the file locally, it won't get copied. We're
thinking about adding an "extract" goal to AMP (AppFuse Maven Plugin),
but it might be easier to just tell folks to copy from
target/WARNAME/*.
Matt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
