Thank you - that makes more sense.


mraible wrote:
> 
> applicationContext-test.xml is for testing AOP advice w/o having to
> connect to the database.  applicationContextForServerTestFn.xml was
> not created by AppFuse - one of your team members probably added it.
> 
> Matt
> 
> On 2/28/07, tonyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Well, that doesn't seem to be true. We have an
>> applicationContext-test.xml
>> and an applicationContextForServerTestFn.xml which are located in the
>> test
>> package area with the functional tests.
>>
>> I'm assuming that AppFuse created these context files.
>>
>>
>> mraible wrote:
>> >
>> > In most cases, we do use the context files you use to run your
>> > application. For the most part, the only test context file is
>> > applicationContext-resources.xml.
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> > On 2/28/07, tonyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm curious as to why AppFuse has structured the testing framework it
>> >> generates in the manner it does; relying on a test
>> applicationContext.xml
>> >> and extending the Spring test class. We have encountered a great deal
>> of
>> >> problems with that set up because our actual applicationContext is
>> very
>> >> different, so our tests can pass, but our application doesn't work as
>> >> expected.
>> >>
>> >> Are there any reasons for having a dual structure? It seems that the
>> >> actual
>> >> applicationContext should be the one that the test framework uses and
>> >> that
>> >> extending the Spring Test class only creates another layer of
>> obfuscation
>> >> and debug problems since you have to learn about setting parameters to
>> >> control that base test class.
>> >>
>> >> Tony
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/General-Comment-Question-about-Functional-Testing-in-AppFuse-tf3310270s2369.html#a9208067
>> >> Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://raibledesigns.com
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/General-Comment-Question-about-Functional-Testing-in-AppFuse-tf3310270s2369.html#a9225917
>> Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://raibledesigns.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/General-Comment-Question-about-Functional-Testing-in-AppFuse-tf3310270s2369.html#a9234742
Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to