The reason I didn't advocate incorporating them was because when I tried the code from the IBM article (almost a year ago), it didn't work. If you can get them to work, and it's not too confusing to the end users, we'll add them.
The project I'm currently working on uses them and it seems somewhat difficult to understand - they create an Interface and a bean definition each time they need a finder. I'm fine with creating an interface, but creating a 5-line bean definition to go with it seems cumbersome and can quicky get out of hand IMO. Matt On 3/13/07, Sanjiv Jivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a bit late on catching up with this but I see a note stating that finder introductions are not being incorporated : http://issues.appfuse.org/browse/APF-424 I thought that finder introductions were pretty cool were one could just have a named query and the finder introduction ties this up with the implementation of the finder of the same name. The spring config for this looks fancy but is really just something to get used to like the transaction proxy stuff. Maybe its just one of those things that seem more useful / convenient than they really are.. but I think I might give it a whirl and see how helpful it is. Anyone else have comments or experience with this? Thanks, Sanjiv
-- http://raibledesigns.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
