So, any other suggested solution to avoid this potential StatifFilter conflict? My goal is to allow a user be able to get a pdf report via a url of "xxxxxx.pdf" instead of "xxxxxx.html".
mraible wrote: > > Just to warn you - if you're depending on the functionality of the > StaticFilter in 2.0 M4 - I haven't tested if it will work when Struts > intercepts the forward. > > Matt > > On 3/28/07, wnqq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Dear Matt, >> >> Many thanks. The following config works: >> >> web.xml: >> >> <filter-mapping> >> <filter-name>struts</filter-name> >> <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern> >> <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher> >> <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher> >> </filter-mapping> >> >> urlrewrite.xml: >> >> <rule> >> <from>^/report(.*)List.xls</from> >> <to type="forward">/report$1ListXLS.html</to> >> </rule> >> >> >> mraible wrote: >> > >> > Make sure you have <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher> on your struts >> > filter to catch the forward. >> > >> > Matt >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-customize-Struts2-action-extention-%22.html%22-to-%22.pdf%22-or-%22.xls%22-for-reports--tf3477247s2369.html#a9714719 Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
