On 8/20/07, Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Raible wrote: > > > On 8/20/07, Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> I really think that if autowiring doesn't work with the example, "zero > >> configuration" shouldn't even be mentioned on that page; it's just > >> misleading. > > > > Autowiring doesn't work when doing tests, but it does at runtime, no? > > Sure, but that distinction isn't shown on the page - right after: > "Run the PersonActionTest ..." > you explain how zero configuration avoids the need to manually create the > bean. > > >> I've never been a big fan of this sort of testing scenario, and you > >> haven't made a convert of me yet :-) > > > > It might just be the verbage in the tutorial. If you have suggestions > > for making things clearer - we'd love to hear it. > > I did - I really don't think the commentary about zero configuration belongs > on that page. If it's kept, there at least needs to be a clear explanation > that you can't both have the test and the zero configuration > -- > derek >
Maybe it's possible to have Zero Configuration in a testing scenario - we'll see what the Struts User list has to say: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-Zero-Configuration-in-a-JUnit-Test--tf4302186.html http://tinyurl.com/2voz29 Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
