That's the weird thing - not seeing anything in the logs.

Ah well, thank god for SVN.  I just rolled back, and re-implemented the
changes I wanted, and it's all working again.  Just a bit of weirdness.


On 11/10/07, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What's the error you're seeing? From a logging perspective, it all
> looks fine.
>
> Matt
>
> On Nov 10, 2007, at 11:28 AM, John Kwon wrote:
>
> > [quality] DEBUG [http-8080-1] JstlView.render(227) | Rendering view
> > with name 'afiles' with model {aFileSamplingList=
> > [20070223_D10-4122P|245 A-FILES|12 A-FILES|||02/23/2007|0,
> > 20070223_D10-DIG-01|6 A-FILES|1 A-FILES|||02/23/2007|0, BOXB|2 A-
> > FILES|1 A-FILES|||02/23/2007|0]} and static attributes {}
> > [quality] DEBUG [http-8080-1]
> > JstlView.exposeModelAsRequestAttributes(297) | Added model object
> > 'aFileSamplingList' of type [java.util.ArrayList] to request in
> > view with name 'afiles'
> > [quality] DEBUG [http-8080-1]
> > JstlView.exposeModelAsRequestAttributes(297) | Added model object
> > 'rc' of type
> > [org.springframework.web.servlet.support.RequestContext] to request
> > in view with name 'afiles'
> >
> > That's normal behavior...
> >
> > I have a controller, that after doing formBackingObject, has the
> > following:
> >
> > [quality] DEBUG [http-8080-2]
> > RDFFilePullRequestController.formBackingObject(88) | In the display
> > list there are: 1
> > [quality] DEBUG [http-8080-2]
> > InternalResourceViewResolver.resolveViewName(81) | Cached view
> > [rdfForm]
> > [quality] DEBUG [http-8080-2] DispatcherServlet.render(1139) |
> > Rendering view [org.springframework.web.servlet.view.JstlView: name
> > 'rdfForm'; URL [/WEB-INF/pages/rdfForm.jsp]] in DispatcherServlet
> > with name 'dispatcher'
> > [
> >
> > and it never does any JstlView methods...  it's as though the
> > Dispatcher croaked...
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to