okay.. i'm running a tapestry-basic app. after changing all pom's, i still have the problem. has anyone an idea?
Matthew Sinclair wrote: > > Good point about the pom - the one I made the change in was the root pom > at the top level, above the "core" and "web" directories (in a > tapestry-modular archetype). HTH, M@ > > > traceon wrote: >> >> hi together, >> >> unfortunatley this doesn't work for me. in which specific pom i have to >> do this changes!? i have upto 5 pom's (wich tapestry-spring, >> tapestry-flash entries) in my target and 1 in my src folder. i've changed >> all specific entries from "runtime" to compile, but i still get the >> error. are there any more requried steps? >> >> thx for your help! >> >> >> >> Matthew Sinclair wrote: >>> >>> Matt and Mark, >>> >>> I think I may have isolated the problem here (if not completely solved >>> it). Because the code works as advertised when running jetty:run-war >>> (and tomcat:run), it has to be something to do with the way packaging >>> works for the container that causes the problem. So, after looking at >>> this page: >>> >>> http://static.appfuse.org/appfuse-tapestry/dependencies.html >>> >>> And comparing that with my pom, I noticed that I had scope="compile" for >>> tapestry-spring and scope="runtime" for tapestry-flash. Then it dawned >>> on me, I'd changed the scope for tapestry-spring in an earlier attempt >>> to hunt down this problem. What made me twig was the fact that the >>> problem reported by tapestry had *moved* from not knowing about >>> "type='spring'", to not knowing about "persist='flash'". >>> >>> Changing the scope from "runtime" to "compile" time for both >>> tapestry-spring and tapestry-flash in the web/pom.xml allowed jetty:run >>> to work. >>> >>> Wow, that took me a lot longer to work through than I had hoped, but at >>> least it's fixed. I can't say I know *why* changing the scope from >>> runtime to compile makes jetty:run work, but I'll leave that for another >>> day. >>> >>> Regards, >>> M@ >>> >>> >>> Mark Rosenthal-2 wrote: >>>> >>>> Outstanding, Matt! I can continue development with frequent restarts, >>>> but it'll be so much nicer to have directory scanning and >>>> auto-reloading. I'm new to the world of Maven, and find it somewhat >>>> frustrating to not see what's going on under the covers. In the >>>> meantime, I'll give tomcat:run a go. >>>> >>>> mraible wrote: >>>>> FWIW, I've posted this to the Tapestry users mailing list: >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-jetty%3Arun-when-using-Tapestry-4.1.3-tf4489399.html#a12805568 >>>>> >>>>> Matt >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-jetty%3Arun-in-Tapestry-basic-archetype-tf4485474s2369.html#a13909545 Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]