So, you are telling me that Seam is like Appfuse, but the big difference is man-hour working on it. But I think Appfuse scope is broader, doesn't it?
I don't know, perhaps I will look at it these days. On Dec 5, 2007 11:24 AM, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe it is worth playing with - especially if you plan on using > JSF. It uses a lot of the same libraries that AppFuse does, but it > has a full-time development staff working on the project (from > JBoss). It doesn't use Spring, but it allows you to use Spring. > > It's 2.0 version is no longer tied to JSF, but there's no > integrations that I know of that are as strong as its JSF support. > There's Wicket integration, but I don't believe anyone is using it. > > Matt > > On Dec 5, 2007, at 8:16 AM, Carlos Ortiz wrote: > > > Put it simple. > > I ask if this project is worth playing with. Is this tied to JSF > > only? Does it use Spring Framework? > > These questions are from a person who does not anything about Seam, > > I am just curious before reading more on the subject. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
