I think a better word would be "target" war if that's what is being built here...?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We use dependent because it seems to work best when describing a > dependency - which is what the war is in your pom.xml. > > Matt > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Chad Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When I read the following documentation at the following URL: > > > > http://static.appfuse.org/maven-warpath-plugin/add-classes-mojo.html > > > > I am confused by the word "dependent" in the following context: > > ----------------------------------- > > Optional Parameters > > > > warpathExcludes String The filter that determines the resources, > from > > the "dependent" war's WEB-INF/classes directory, to exclude from the > > classpath. Note that excludes takes priority over includes. Th default is > > the empty string, i.e. exclude nothing. > > > > warpathIncludes String The filter that determines the resources, > from > > the "dependent" war's WEB-INF/classes directory, to include on the > > classpath. Default is "**". > > ----------------------------------- > > > > To my understanding, the "dependent" war should be phrased as "depended" > > war. Can someone please clarify this a little bit? I am happy to learn if > it > > is due to my poor English. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chad > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
