No I haven't but on your recommendation I will - It makes sense regarding
the PE what you say.
Thanks again,

Tim


On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Scriptaculous is already built in, have you tried using it? The reason
> I don't like using Tag Libraries that emit JavaScript and allow
> "automatic Ajax" is because they generally don't lend themselves well
> to progressive enhancement.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Enhancement
>
> Matt
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:51 AM, tim robertson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Matt,
> > I did in fact, *just* get it working...
> > What do you recommend for the client side for JSON based ajax (do we
> still
> > call is ajax if it is JSON and not xml - shrug) for Struts2 please?
> > Thanks
> > Tim
> >
> > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please see the last two comments for more information on why we don't
> >> recommend Dojo with Struts 2:
> >>
> >> http://issues.appfuse.org/browse/APF-739
> >>
> >> <quote>
> >> Copying dojo to an AppFuse application will work, but at 5 MB, it
> >> doesn't seem worth the effort. Most of Struts tags that use Dojo are
> >> buggy or slow.
> >>
> >> See the following URL for more information:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Canoo-WebTest-to-Selenium-tf3844464s2369.html#a10887242
> >> </quote>
> >>
> >> The good news is there is a branch with the integration on it, so if
> >> you really want to use it you can.
> >>
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:05 AM, tim robertson
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> > Is there a tutorial anywhere to get dojo working with appfuse struts2?
> >> > In my default.jsp I add:
> >> >
> >> >         <s:head theme="ajax" debug="true"/>
> >> >
> >> > but I get
> >> >
> >> >  - Could not load 'struts.widget.Bind'; last tried '__package__.js'
> >> >
> >> >  - Could not load 'dojo.widget.FilteringTable'; last tried
> >> > '__package__.js'
> >> >
> >> > Is this the correct approach or do you need to have the .js files in
> the
> >> > project itself and remove them from the static filter in the web.xml?
> >> > (when I try that it seems unable to get the *.js due to some relative
> >> > path
> >> > problem)
> >> > Please help!  Head against wall banging all day so far...
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Tim
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to