Hi, I have an implementation with an independent user object. I basically don't use the Appfuse User and Role model. In the process of migration I ran into a problem with my custom UserDetails service. Using the default implementation I get a "More than one UserDetailsService registered. Please use a specific Id in your configuration". I'm sure I can work around this at the sacrifice of the short xml configuration.
I would like to suggest to move the User and Role classes and associated generated code to the implementation directories of the generated application as opposed to storing them in the appfuse jars. This gives more flexibility for users who don't want to do a full source but just don't want the out of the box pojo's and the limitations that come with them: * not being able to use bean ids like user, userManager for your own user beans * loadUserDetails conflicts. It also feels like a more natural separation of concerns. Kind regards, Marc -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/UserDao-in-the-way-on-spring-security-tp17590739s2369p17590739.html Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
