In a future release, I'm hoping to move to extensionless URLs and allow the underlying web framework to use a unique extension.
http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/extensionless_urls_in_java_web Matt On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:33 AM, reddeagle9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I came across the following while trying to integrate FCKEditor into one of > my appfuse projects. I pretty much hit an immediate road block due the > following: > > > [code] > http://dev.fckeditor.net/browser/FCKeditor.Java/tags/2.4/java-core/src/main/java/net/fckeditor/FCKeditor.java > > String sLink = > basePath.concat("/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=").concat( > 251 instanceName); > > [/code] > > As you can see FCKEditor uses fckeditor.html and because it hits my > dispatcher servlet no mapping is found, so we get a 404. > > There is no exclude pattern in the servlet spec so all my .html will hit the > servlet unless i do something as suggested in this post. > > http://www.thoughtsabout.net/blog/archives/000040.html > > So my question to the group. should i be using .html as my filter to the > dispatcher servlet. Im sure this is not going to be the first time i come > across this. Struts used .do as their extensions (which gave away underlying > implementation.) for my next project im considering dropping .html and using > something like .jhtml > > Acegi etc will still capture *.html , *.jhtml so these pages will still > require a login. > > Just wondering what the views of the group are. > > Thanks > Redd > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/to-use-*.html-extension-or-not..-tp18504787s2369p18504787.html > Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
