I believe they both should throw exceptions.

Matt

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:50 AM, tibi <t...@dds.nl> wrote:

> ok i will and this:
>
> " i wonder in both methods, what is the use of the catching part?
> with send (the last one) it only adds a logging (which will be done
> where ever the thrown exception is caught.
> and in the first one there will be send an empty message...."
>
> Matt Raible wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:48 AM, tibi <t...@dds.nl
> > <mailto:t...@dds.nl>> wrote:
> >
> >     list,
> >
> >     i'm looking at the test coverage and in particular the classes
> >     which are
> >     tested below 85%.
> >
> >     i came across the MailEngine. there are these two methods:
> >        /**
> >         * Send a simple message based on a Velocity template.
> >         * @param msg the message to populate
> >         * @param templateName the Velocity template to use (relative to
> >     classpath)
> >         * @param model a map containing key/value pairs
> >         */
> >        public void sendMessage(SimpleMailMessage msg, String
> templateName,
> >     Map model) {
> >            String result = null;
> >
> >            try {
> >                result =
> >     VelocityEngineUtils.mergeTemplateIntoString(velocityEngine,
> >     templateName, model);
> >            } catch (VelocityException e) {
> >                e.printStackTrace();
> >                log.error(e.getMessage());
> >            }
> >
> >            msg.setText(result);
> >            send(msg);
> >        }
> >
> >        /**
> >         * Send a simple message with pre-populated values.
> >         * @param msg the message to send
> >         * @throws org.springframework.mail.MailException when SMTP server
> >     is down
> >         */
> >        public void send(SimpleMailMessage msg) throws MailException {
> >            try {
> >                mailSender.send(msg);
> >            } catch (MailException ex) {
> >                log.error(ex.getMessage());
> >                throw ex;
> >            }
> >        }
> >
> >     i wonder in both methods, what is the use of the catching part?
> >     with send (the last one) it only adds a logging (which will be done
> >     where ever the thrown exception is caught.
> >     and in the first one there will be send an empty message....
> >
> >
> >     in the test case i added this line:
> >            // a null from should work
> >            mailEngine.sendMessage(new String[] {
> >                "f...@bar.com <mailto:f...@bar.com>"
> >            }, null, cpResource, emailBody, emailSubject,
> ATTACHMENT_NAME);
> >
> >     so the null for from is tested too
> >
> >     should i make a jira with phatch??
> >
> >
> > Yes, that would be great.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@appfuse.dev.java.net
> >     <mailto:users-unsubscr...@appfuse.dev.java.net>
> >     For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@appfuse.dev.java.net
> >     <mailto:users-h...@appfuse.dev.java.net>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@appfuse.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@appfuse.dev.java.net
>
>

Reply via email to