GWT is a different beast because it *is* a web framework and you could write your whole application with it. Others, like YUI and Prototype - you typically just use to enhance your application, not write the whole thing. I like GWT and have been using it on a daily basis for the last 4 months. You can read more about an Ajax Framework evaluation I did back in January at:
http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/ajax_framework_analysis_results Matt On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:55 AM, tibi <t...@dds.nl> wrote: > interesting point of view. > in my company there is a bit of a flamewar going on between GWT and > struts2 (me). GWT beeing more a Web2.0 framework seems to have some > advantages. but if i follow you correctly you see that as a downside? > > > > Matt Raible wrote: > > I don't think having an Ajax framework built-in to a web framework is > > a good idea. Often, I think it's easier to program the JavaScript > > rather than having your framework do it for you. Also, if you're > > controlling the JavaScript, you can make your app so it degrades when > > there is no JavaScript enabled. Another disadvantage of having an Ajax > > framework built-in is you're stuck on the web framework's version of > > the library and often they don't seem to be maintained that well. > > > > Matt > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Reza Farshi <reza.far...@gmail.com > > <mailto:reza.far...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Struts folks have discontinued supporting AJAX theme in new > > version (2.1.6) , I am one of struts fan , but b/c of that I think > > it's not reliable to trust to this framework in AJAX area. > > you can do ajaxifying by DWR beside struts framework i think > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Reza Farshi > > <reza.far...@gmail.com <mailto:reza.far...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > After some googling and reading many web logs ,I rather to use > > JSFfor presentation layer, > > There are so many helper jsf component out , boosting RIA > > development, > > ICEFaces , richfaces , and other libraries, > > btw, thanks for your guide, > > > > it's so easy to > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Irshad Buchh > > <ibu...@gmail.com <mailto:ibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > We had a similar situation like yours some time back. We > > picked up Spring MVC > > archetype and managed to add JQuery and we are very > > satisfied. JQuery based > > AJAX is much better than some of the other AJAX frameworks. > > > > --Irshad. > > > > > > mraible wrote: > > > > > > You say you need heavy Ajax. I'd recommend choosing an > > Ajax framework you > > > like (or using Protoype, which ships with AppFuse) and > > then use it which > > > whichever framework you'd prefer. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Reza Farshi > > <reza.far...@gmail.com <mailto:reza.far...@gmail.com>> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> so which is the best (among available arch-types) for > > our problem you > > >> think? > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Matt Raible > > >> <m...@raibledesigns.com > > <mailto:m...@raibledesigns.com>>wrote: > > >> > > >>> The GWT archetype will likely not be available until > > sometime this > > >>> summer. > > >>> > > >>> Matt > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Saeed Iqbal > > <saee...@gmail.com <mailto:saee...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> No i dont know because i didnt use GWT yet. For my > > project rich faces > > >>>> does the job > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Reza Farshi > > >>>> <reza.far...@gmail.com > > <mailto:reza.far...@gmail.com>>wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Dear saeed, > > >>>>> Thnaks for your rocket jet reply. > > >>>>> do u know when gwt arch type will released? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Saeed Iqbal > > <saee...@gmail.com <mailto:saee...@gmail.com>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> For heavy Ajax you could use JSF and put richfaces > > or Prim Faces > > >>>>>> instead of ajax4jsf > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Reza Farshi > > >>>>>> <reza.far...@gmail.com > > <mailto:reza.far...@gmail.com>>wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Dear Friends > > >>>>>>> We are gonna develop a GPS tracking system , > > which one is better > > >>>>>>> archtype to choose? > > >>>>>>> We have used modular struts before in another > > project , but b/c of > > >>>>>>> needing heavy AJAX coding in this project, I > > think it's not a > > >>>>>>> good > > >>>>>>> solution for this project. > > >>>>>>> so what is the best archtype in your opinion? > > >>>>>>> thanks in advance. > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Reza Farshi > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Saeed Iqbal > > >>>>>> CEO - Iqbal Consulting > > >>>>>> http://www.iqbalconsulting.com > > >>>>>> +92-345-5444410 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Reza Farshi > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Saeed Iqbal > > >>>> CEO - Iqbal Consulting > > >>>> http://www.iqbalconsulting.com > > >>>> +92-345-5444410 > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Reza Farshi > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/best-archtype--tp23230652s2369p23254174.html > > Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > users-unsubscr...@appfuse.dev.java.net > > <mailto:users-unsubscr...@appfuse.dev.java.net> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > users-h...@appfuse.dev.java.net > > <mailto:users-h...@appfuse.dev.java.net> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Reza Farshi > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Reza Farshi > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@appfuse.dev.java.net > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@appfuse.dev.java.net > >
