Could someone just tell me if that's the way it's suppose to work?
2008/10/30 emerson cargnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Any idea how I can configure arquiva so that after the first > repository (following the order) would return the jar archiva wouldn't > request the same jar to other repositories down the list? > > regards > Emerson > > 2008/10/28 deckrider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I had also assumed that the order within the repository group meant >> something in this regard. >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:42 AM, emerson cargnin >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I set up a repository group that centralises all our repositories. >>> >>> This includes: >>> - internal: jars that are not public available and internal libraries >>> - public: this repo proxies all jars available in maven repository >>> (Proxy Connector to http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) >>> - internal legacy: old m1 repository that has both non public and >>> public jars. (Proxy Connector to our old ftp m1 repo) >>> >>> The way I created the archiva setup, my repository group should get >>> the public jars into the "public" archiva repository (from >>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2). >>> I believe the order of the repo in the group (virtual repo) means that >>> the first repos listed there are searched first right? >>> >>> I wanted to use this behaviour to filter out unnecessary public jars >>> that previously we kept on our m1 legacy repository. After a while I >>> could go to the archiva legacy repo and see which jars are efectivelly >>> need to be moved into the archiva "internal" repo. >>> >>> The problem is that the way the repository group is working, once I >>> try to download commons-lang-2.4.jar, for example, archiva connects >>> to both repositories, and proxy it locally, instead of looking in the >>> public one first, and as it finds the jar there, there is no need to >>> to get from the legacy internal m1. >>> >>> Is this the way the repository groups should work? Is there a way to >>> enforce that once a jar has been found in one of the repositories in >>> the group, the other ones wouldn't be searched? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Emerson >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ASCII ribbon campaign: >> () against HTML email >> /\ against Microsoft attachments >> Information: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html >> >
