|
Hi Roland,
If the official manual were a wiki, then the
main editor (me) would have to check all modifications after they are
applied.
In our current way of working, I check all proposed
changes (whenever I am ready) and apply them.
And Linus, our project lead, likes
it when the editor role is explicit and in his impression, the
wiki-based user manuals are uneven w.r.t. language, contents, and
quality. He also likes the docbook format because of the pdf-result that
gives the impression that we are going to eventually print it.
Hence we do not see much advantage in the use
of a wiki for the manual. Maybe you want to convince us from the
opposite?
But anyhow, I welcome any addition from users
to the manual!
Please send your proposals to me directly, or
preferrably, to the dev list.
The best would be if you can create a patch on the
docbook xml that is the source of the manual, but I will accept any
format.
Regards,
Michiel
|
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.9/417 - Release Date: 11/08/2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
