Michiel, Thanks. I entered the issue into bugzilla (# 4728).
Regards, Mark On 4/19/07, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mark, You are not missing something, but ArgoUML is. Indeed, the association between the actor and the "Zoom" usecase should suffice for the critic NOT to trigger. Please enter an issue for this case in our database - this issue is unknown yet. See: http://argouml.tigris.org/project_bugs.html Regards, ----- Original Message ----- *From:* Mark Fortner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *To:* [email protected] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:29 PM *Subject:* [argouml-users] Strange Advice From Critics I've been trying to use the critics as a way of insuring that my model is complete. However, when creating use case diagrams I've noticed that the critics often provide me with feedback that doesn't make sense. For example, let's say you want to create the following use-cases Actor -- (Zooming) --> (Zoom Into Rectangular Selection) --> (Zoom In By Increment) --> (Zoom Out By Increment) To create the first generalization of Zooming (Zoom Into Rectangular Selection), I click the Zooming use-case and drag the generalization arrow at the top of the use-case. When I release the mouse, the new use case is created, and I enter it's name directly into the use-case ellipse. However, when I do this I get feedback telling me that I need to "Add Associations" to the usecase even though in my estimation I just created the association that I wanted. Am I missing something? Regards, Mark ------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.4/768 - Release Date: 19/04/2007 5:32
