Hi Michiel,

Thanks for the insight!

I use the Statechart diagram to create a Workflow in Plone (with
ArchgenXML). And in my workflow I need to be able to revert to the initial
state (let's call it Draft).

I think a simple way of resolving this issue, is having the transition
between the initial state and a second state (Draft) made automatically.
This way I can work with "Draft" state as the initial (at least for the user
point of view!).

But this is probably an issue more suitable for Plone mailing list ;)

Regards,
José Saraiva

-- 


[image: 531]
José Saraiva //
(00351) 914105897 (mobile) //
http://plumia.com <%20http://plumia.com>



On 11/2/07, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Hi José,
>
> Well, ArgoUML does not allow this because it is not allowed according the
> UML standard.
> The easiest way to understand this, is when you realize that an initial
> state (and its single outgoing arrow) is not really a state, but merely a
> way to point to the starting state.
>
> If you have an inital state pointing to state "A", then what is the reason
> for not having the "revert" ytransitions also point to "A"?
> If there is such reason, I would add a simple state, call it e.g.
> "initial" or "idle", and have the black disc and the "revert" action enter
> this state.
>
> Regards,
> Michiel
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* José Saraiva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2007 1:00 PM
> *Subject:* [argouml-users] Revert to Initial State
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm drawing a Statechart diagram, and i need that my initial state accepts
> two incoming transitions from other states (a "revert" action"). Is there a
> way of doing this in ArgoUML?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> José Saraiva
>
> --
>
>
> [image: 531]
> José Saraiva //
> (00351) 914105897 (mobile) //
> http://plumia.com
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.17/1103 - Release Date:
> 1/11/2007 6:01
>
>

Reply via email to