Bob Tarling a écrit : > Regarding the "Add instance variables" critic that does sound like a > defect (the wording and the fact it appears at all). Please create an > issue in issuezilla. > Done, see issue 5820 [http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5820]. Thank you. Olivier > With your attachment I see no critic suggesting a utility. I think it > should only do that if all operations are static. > > If you see any issues like this feel free to just go right ahead and > create the relevant issues explaining how to reproduce. > > Regards > > Bob > > 2009/6/28 Olivier Cailloux <[email protected]>: > >> Dear list, >> >> I notice that when considering a class containing only frozen >> attributes, argo (0.28) suggests defining it as utility or defining >> instance variables. I don't understand this advice, is it adequate? >> IMHO, a frozen attribute is an instance attribute anyway (why does it >> talk about a "variable" btw?). And I don't think that the utility >> stereotype applies to entities, i.e. model objects, even if they are >> immutable. See hereby a sample xmi and zargo project, and below an >> example java class, which trigger the critic. >> >> package argo.simple; >> >> public class ValueContainer { >> private final int m_value; >> >> public ValueContainer(int value) { >> m_value = value; >> } >> >> public int getValue() { >> return m_value; >> } >> >> } >> >> Please tell me if I am misunderstanding something. >> Olivier >> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2366069 >> >> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: >> [[email protected]]. >> > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2366090 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: > [[email protected]]. >
------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2366329 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
