> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Neustupny [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [argouml-users] How to have junction points with text
> showing?
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> the only way to do something similar is to use an ordinary textbox from
> the drawing tool, but then it's just a text string on the diagram with
> no link to the UML model. Another option is to add guards to the
> outgoing transitions, and add the condition to the expression field of
> the guards. This way, it the conditions apear on the diagram next to
> their transitions and surrounded by [ ] brackets.

I figured that was the UML-ish way to do it, but I couldn't figure out how to 
do that, either.

> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:42:08 -0700
> > Von: "David M. Karr" <[email protected]>
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: [argouml-users] How to have junction points with text
> showing?
> 
> > Perhaps I'm missing something simple, but I'm trying to draw an
> Activity
> > Diagram with junction points, where you can actually see the text of
> the
> > condition in the junction.  Presently, when I create a junction, I
> can't
> > find any way to have the text of the condition to check to be visible
> in
> > the diagram.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2
> 369153
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
> > [[email protected]].
> 
> --
> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2
> 369625
> 
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-
> [email protected]].

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2369726

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
[[email protected]].

Reply via email to