Hi Mark, the UI never offered the choice between the two seq diagram implementations. Sequence2 is active for several releases now. The old implementation was kept only for old projects so they still load. I think there is no conversion functionality, old seq diagram will keep using the old implementation.
Maybe we should clean issuezilla from all seq diagram issues that refer to the old implementation. A "WONTFIX" with mentioning the new implementation would be suitable. Any User can do this by testing if the issue is still for newly created seq diagrams. Just my opinion. Regards, Thomas -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:39:54 +0000 > Von: Bob Tarling <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [argouml-users] Sequence vs Sequence2 > Hi Mark > > This is more relevant to the dev list than users I think. > > Regards > > Bob > > On 14 March 2011 16:40, Mark Fortner <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was working on a Sequence diagram recently and noticed a number of > > problems with it. There seem to be a number of outstanding issues in > > Bugzilla for it. I also noticed that we have a Sequence2 > implementation, > > and I was wondering which diagram type should I be using? What are the > > plans for transitioning to the new Sequence diagram? > > Regards, > > Mark > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2711459 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: > [[email protected]]. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=449&dsMessageId=2711462 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
