I guess why we still have ECM is because I haven't found a good example of using Fortress.. We use ECM in a couple ways, as part of a fulcrum test container, as part of Turbine's AvalonComponentService. If you could point me in the direction of some code using Fortress, I could go ahead and update the container we are using.
Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:16 PM > To: Avalon framework users > Subject: Re: Changing the ConfigurationBuilder > > > Eric Pugh wrote: > > > After looking through the Javadocs, if I wanted to provide > a Configuration > > backed by commons-configuration, then I should implement the > > org.apache.framework.configuration.Configuration interface. > I guess it > > should pass the DefaultConfigurationTestCase as well. I > can look at the > > NamingConfigurationBuilder in the avalon-excalibur CVS repo > for a pattern to > > follow.. > > > > But I think what I am not understanding is how to tell > excalibur that I have > > a different ConfigurationBuilder to use... Should I be > looking at the > > avalon-excalibur repo at all? Or should I focus on trying > to figure out > > fortress? > > I would recommend avoiding ECM altogether. Fortress is the > immediate future, > with Merlin close on its heels. > > -- > > "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little > temporary safety > deserve neither liberty nor safety." > - Benjamin Franklin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
