>So, chip in, even if you think that your "story" is nothing to tell. If you

>are new to Avalon, please indicate what you think is attractive and what
>you 
>have problems with. It doesn't have to follow Aaron's 'questionaire' to the

>dot, it is just a guidance...

I am actually a die-hard VB programmer who is wrestling with learning Java
so I don't know how relevant my comments will be. However, as invited:

My only real exposure to Avalon so far has been to use Phoenix as the
container for James which I am evaluating as a possible mail server for my
ISP venture. I don't ( yet ) understand exactly how the container and the
application fit together and which does what piece of the overall process.

Perhaps one day I will complete Java-101 and find a use for a container. If
it can provide configurable, common, reusable services which I can
incorporate into my applications ... then ... I'm interested.

I don't understand quite why there are multiple ( 4 ? ) container variants -
although I believe that they are actually just 2 generations of 2 variants.
But, when I develop that first application, which container do I select, and
more importantly, why?

One thing which is worth listening to though. As a potential user of an
Avalon-contained application, I am a bit concerned to hear that there is
some debate on the function and direction of the product ... perhaps I
should select Exim or Postfix instead of James ...

I'm not particularly looking for replies to my comments / questions because
they're not meant to generate tangential discussions distracting from the
original thread ... just some user comment

Regards,

Roy



----------------------------------------------------------------
[This message has been routed via James V2.1.3 on REBEX-MERCURY]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to