simple work-around for the latter bug: if the pool implements Initializable the initialze() method is not called in the constructor of AbstractPool but later when m_min is already set.
/eike "Eike Stepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > btw. simply removing the field in DefaultPool does not work > either. the m_min field in AbstractPool is set after initialize() > is called! > > in general the package seems to be preliminary or out-dated. > the roles of AbstractPool and DefaultPool seem to be nearly > identical, their responsibilities are spread over both implementations. > > /eike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
