thanks ;-)
"Farr, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eike Stepper > > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 4:43 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] The Future of Avalon Repository > > > > hi niclas, > > > > the "avalon must die" link you provided is a bit scaring! > > > > after several weeks of struggling with ~500 classes > > and an unconsolidated documentation it really doesn't > > light my mood that i have to read that all my effort was > > for a potentially starving technology ;-( > > > > could you please explain the dilemma for an unexperienced > > "external" like me?! > > The dilemma is now, thankfully, past us. Or at least that is my opinion > now. > > For the new site (which is not yet published) I put together a little > summary of Avalon's history which includes an explanation of why Avalon was > in a bit of a bind for such a long time. Much of it was based on some > earlier documentation I wrote about the various containers: > http://wiki.apache.org/avalon/ContainerStory > > Long story short is that now that Excalibur has been promoted to a new > Apache project (http://excalibur.apache.org) and Phoenix has a home with the > new Loom development at Codehaus (http://loom.codehaus.org) a lot of > controversy can be averted. Avalon has things in order and can focus on a > (newer) single container platform, ie- Merlin, while users of the older > Avalon technologies aren't left high and dry. > > So, I for one believe our most difficult days are behind us and users and > developers alike have no more need to worry about Avalon's status. > > J. Aaron Farr > SONY ELECTRONICS > STP SYSTEMS > (724) 696-7653 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
