Guys You really figured all out ... congratulations!!!
I have a project in mind, which is very interesting ... and I will use Metro ... all the way.
//maquina
From: Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Avalon framework users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Avalon framework users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Avalon vs EJB [was; Avalon and EJB] Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 03:33:21 +0800
On Thursday 25 November 2004 03:25, Samuel Ferrer wrote:
> Don't compare EJB with Metro ...
Everyone who has seen both would say that. :o)
> (and I wander if is possible to put scripts on the context map, so the > needs of the component can be defined at a syntax level supported by an > ortogonal small set of semantics --it means actual entry values)
No but you can create your own Context entries, i.e. the component can declare
a "requirement" of a context entry, which you can supply in the assembly
descriptor (a.k.a the block).
Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
