Let's do it properly. Why don't you make a proposal taking into account all
use cases and I'll review it.
We can take it offlline

a


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Junjun Zhang <[email protected]>wrote:

> OK, let's make 'left join' the default behaviour. However, we will have to
> bare it in mind that there are use cases that require 'inner join' between
> data marts. For example, find the common genes that are over expressed in
> breast cancer and pancreatic cancer datasets. I understand that we do not
> support this type of query in the ICGC data portal at this time, but since
> this is a frequently requested use case we should properly design and
> implement support for that in the near future. Let's discuss details later.
> Cheers,
> Junjun
>
>
> From: Arek Kasprzyk <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:55:24 -0400
>
> To: jzhang <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [BioMart Users] OUTER JOIN between tables
>
> <snip>
>
> >2. left join with inter mart querying needs to be solved with in list
>> >annotation at the same time
>>
>> Just wanted to confirm with you that I understand the 'in list annotation'
>> use case correctly. Do you think the query should behave as inner join for
>> 'in list annotation' and BioMart should support both left join and inner
>> join between different marts? If so, then that's what I see it as well.
>> For that we can make 'left join' the default behaviour (as it's more
>> common) and provide a mechanism to override this in case deployer wants
>> alter that to 'inner join'.
>>
>>
> </snip>
>
> I would just do everything as  default left join. In this way people would
> not be loosing their identifiers
> when trying to annotate stuff that does not exist in a given mart. For
> inter-mart querying just the same. We can
> discuss more technical details offline at some point
>
> a
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.biomart.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to