Hi Dave Thanks for you feedback, it is very valuable
Le ven. 29 juil. 2016 à 21:04, Dave Vitek <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi all, > > I tried to sign up to log into the issue tracker but the capta is > evidently not working. If anyone wants to give me the username dvitek that > would work. > Verm, can you make sure dvitek can get an account? > > 1) With the web application, the "force build" form seems to ignore the > contents of the "Your name" field. It always sends email to anonymous@ > instead of the username provided by the client. The "Build properties" end > up saying: > owner anonymous Force Build Form Old versions of buildbot would email the > specified username if the forced build failed. The new one just causes > bounces because it always emails anonymous@. > I though I did resolve this issue some times ago.Those kind of feature are hard to test e2e so we have to rely on the community for it :-( It is however recommended to configure an authentication plugin in order to increase security and avoid people to always enter their email. There are a bunch of options here, let us know if/why this is not convenient for you http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3587#ticket > 2) If I take an existing buildmaster, adjust the configuration so it has a > many-to-many (builder, tag) relation, and then run "buildbot reconfig" I > get a couple exceptions. I do not know if the same thing happens if there > is no pre-existing database. In the old configuration that did not cause > problems where no builder had more than one tag. Some old tags went away > entirely. > Looking at the error, I would say you have duplicates in tags list. This problem should indeed not be managed at db level, but should trigger a configuration error. This is quite easy to add a test and fix just in time for rc2 http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3588#ticket > > > A couple other random questions after the upgrade to 0.9: > > Is there any way to make the "Builders" page always show the result of the > most recent run, even if it's older than the time horizon it seems to want > to show? > There is no way to do that right now. With current infra, it is difficult to code this in a scalable manner. This is a problem that shall be resolved after 0.9 release http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3589#ticket > Do you know what it means if a builder's page shows a build is 'building' > but the build's page says it is 'finished (n days ago)'? > I would say this is an inconsitency. Cannot say much more without more details. > - Dave > > PS > There might be a javascript memory drag on the "builders" page. If I > leave it open overnight, chrome will invariably have a crashed tab in the > morning. > How many builds to you get overnight? Indeed there is nothing which clean up the older builds to keep memory usage in a certain bound.
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.buildbot.net/mailman/listinfo/users
