Okay, what I've seen from the pom.xml generation code is that it doesn't generate dependencies. Even dependencies between subprojects. The buildr code which I supposed is used for this is in artifact.rb:
http://github.com/apache/buildr/blob/trunk/lib/buildr/packaging/artifact.rb#L133 As you can see it is quite minimal; but would probably be simple to extend a bit. -P On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez <[email protected]>wrote: > Peter, > > it would simply be used to get the deps really and basic compile/package. > I don't need it to be an exact replica of the buildr buildfile. Thanks > for the heads > up though. > > jesus > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Peter Maas <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wondered I you managed to get this setup working in a comfortable way? > I > > guess that *if* you can get this to work you have to be careful what > > features of buildr you use; since it is quite easy to do stuff which will > > never translate nicely into a pom file. > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Jesus M. Rodriguez <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> thanks I'll search the list archives. Sorry about that :) > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > Yes, it can. You can find examples of that in the archives of this > >> mailing > >> > list. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:56, Jesus M. Rodriguez <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Is it possible to generate a pom.xml from a buildfile? We use buildr > >> >> as our build tool, we have a build system > >> >> that requires maven so I'd like to generate a pom.xml to integrate > >> >> with that tool. > >> >> > >> >> sincerely, > >> >> jesus rodriguez > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
