Hi,
Well cygwin is what our developer organization use today (with maven 1), we have loads of shellscripts and stuff so windows is not really an option and I don't think linux is going to be an option in the near future either. I ended up with testing buildr+jruby because I wasn't very successful in getting buildr installed and working with plain ruby. (tried with cygwins ruby package, but never managed to install buildr using gem install due to rjb version requirement I think) cheers Magnus > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:08:33 -0500 > Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5 > To: [email protected] > > I have to ask why you use cygwin and jruby. > > No good reason otherwise. I can say in general that jruby 1.5.1 is faster > than 1.4. > > Thanks for using Buildr. We are working (well, I am envisioning) on a > functional test framework. We will implement performance tests with it at > some point. > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 07:54, Magnus Rundberget > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr > > 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin. > > > > On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the > > build with that it now took about 50 seconds. > > > > Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ? > > > > kind regards > > Magnus > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. > > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
