Hi, On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> Hi Kristof, > > Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for reporting. > If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a trivial > fix) it would be appreciated. I posted on the ticket, but I'll repeat it here since it's a curious problem: it seems like the issue is that under 1.9.1, rubygems is activating the most recent installed version of rubyzip (0.9.4 in Kristof's case), not the version (0.9.1) that buildr requests. Bug #3140[1] in MRI's issue tracker seems like it is related. I don't think this can be fixed in buildr. Rhett [1]: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140 > > alex > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling >> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into >> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility >> issue.. but sure you know better than me. >> >> The issue is shown here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on >> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have >> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out. >> >> thanks a lot, >> K >>
