No, right now there is no site beside the github Page. You can create issues on Github. I have no idea how many people are actively using ivy4r till today I just answered personal questions about ivy4r as did Peter by providing a simple example or answering questions that have been posted on this mailing list.
Regards Klaas -----Original Message----- From: Nikos Maris [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ivy4r vs buildr Is there any support site for ivy4r, bug tracking or a mailing list? On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Klaas Reineke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > ivy4r is not dead at all :) > > I am still maintaining it and we are using it on our build server every day > for around 90 build plans. There is a need for better documentation and a few > examples. Right now I don't know any open feature request. There is an > outstanding merge from "stephenh" on git, but beside this everything is up to > date and working. > > Regards Klaas > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikos Maris [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 9:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ivy4r vs buildr > > Is there any partial Ivy support in the svn? Ivy4r seems to be a dead project. > > ---------------------------------- > Nikos Maris > Software Engineer > IMC Technologies SA > www.imc.com.gr > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Sunday, August 22, 2010, Nikos Maris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Why does buildr provide dependency management when there is already >>> Ivy? Does it make sense to make the transitive method use ivy4r in an >>> upcoming buildr release? Having a fork of Ivy that is less >>> configurable but simpler, is something that I wished when I started >>> these days to learn Ivy. >> >> What buildr does today is the minimum/easiest that could accomodate >> people without reinventing Ivy. >> >> Yes, the plan is to reuse Ivy (or a subset) to complete transitive >> dependency support. It will likely be an opinionated approach, with >> many choices taken out of what's possible to do with Ivy, aligning >> ourselves with Maven in terms of compatibility, and favoring >> determinism. >> >> For people who want full Ivy support, Buildr would defer to the Ivy4r plugin. >> >> The timeframe for this seems to be Buildr 1.5 -- hopefully before the >> end of 2010 but no guarantees. >> >> alex >> >
