No, thank you.  You guys have done a fantastic job with Buildr.  

Keep those creature comforts coming.

On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:

> That's fine, I'll reopen. Thanks for helping making Buildr better!
> 
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:37, Mark Petrovic <[email protected]> wrote:
> I added a comment to issue 161.   I see in my Jira view no way to reopen the 
> issue - sorry.
> 
> On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> 
>> No idea. Can you open a bug about it or reopen BUILDR-161 with your test 
>> case from earlier ?
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 08:58, Mark Petrovic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm using buildr to wrap several existing projects, one of which has some 
>> JUnit 3 tests stuffed way down in an obscure directory.  Could this be 
>> triggering the 'override' message below?  Beyond that, there is no other 
>> JUnit 3 code anywhere.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>> 
>> > Not sure, --trace probably makes the application more verbose and gives 
>> > back
>> > output as you go.
>> > It might be a setting in the ant runner for junit.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 20:41, Mark Petrovic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> My experience with buildr is limited, but I don't remember it buffering
>> >> console output during the test phase.
>> >>
>> >> If I do
>> >>
>> >> $ buildr clean test
>> >>
>> >> the console output pauses here
>> >>
>> >> Running tests in parent:vzservice:vzserver
>> >> Trying to override old definition of datatype junit
>> >>   [junit] Testsuite: org.foo.rest.TestIngest
>> >> <pause>
>> >>
>> >> whereupon when the tests (of the JUnit4 variety) finish, I get the full
>> >> console output in one large dump.
>> >>
>> >> But if I do
>> >>
>> >> $ buildr --trace clean test
>> >>
>> >> I can see the individual tests being invoked as they execute.
>> >>
>> >> Is this buffered output normal during the test phase?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Mark Petrovic
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Petrovic
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Petrovic
> 
> 
> 


--
Mark Petrovic


Reply via email to