I've created the following enhancement trackers following this discussion, Shell tasks should use JAVA_OPTS by default https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-537
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-537> Shell tasks should support passing :java_args https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-538 ScalaTest should support :fork option https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-539 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-539> alex On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Sean, > > ScalaTest currently runs test in the same VM as Buildr (through RJB if > you're using MRI) so it's too late to pass the java.library.path through > test.using. > > (Incidentaly, we should probably add support for the :fork option for > ScalaTest). > > To get the library path set up correctly with RJB, either set the JAVA_OPTS > environment variable before invoking Buildr, > > export JAVA_OPTS=-Djava.library.path=... > > or put the following at the top of your Buildfile, > > ENV["JAVA_OPTS"] = "-Djava.library.path=..." > > alex > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Sean Rhea <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on moving a Scala library for accessing sqlite3 to Buildr. >> As this library wraps the C interface to sqlite3, it contains some >> JNI code. On MacOS, the only way to pick up a JNI library is to add >> it to the current directory, or to pass a java.library.path property >> to the JVM. I took a look at lib/buildr/scala/shell.rb, and it >> doesn't look like there's any way to pass properties to the JVM when >> involving the Scala shell. (At least, not in version 1.4.3.) >> >> I also tried to use ScalaTest with my project, and I added this line >> to the buildfile: >> >> test.using :properties => { "java.library.path" => "target/native" } >> >> But that doesn't seem to pick up the library, either. >> >> If I run this from the command line, it works fine: >> >> scala -classpath target/classes -Djava.library.path=target/native Test >> >> What am I missing? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Sean >> -- >> "I refuse to accept the idea that the ‘isness’ of man’s present nature >> makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal ‘oughtness’ >> that forever confronts him." --MLK >> > >
