Yeah, I briefly thought about that yesterday but the one thing that stopped me was that deciding on a qualifier for the package (e.g., Java uses -javadoc). Looks like SBT is using -docs for scaladoc packaging. I'm seeing both -javadoc, -scaladoc used for Scala projects deployed on scala-tools.org. Probably should make it configurable at this point, though we still have to pick a good default (I'm leaning towards -scaladoc).
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-564 to track this. <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-564>alex On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Mathias <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > cool. Thanks for the quick fix. > Btw. wouldn't it be nicer if I could write "package :scaladoc" instead of > "package :javadoc" for my Scala-only modules? > > Cheers, > Mathias > > --- > [email protected] > http://www.parboiled.org > > On 26.01.2011, at 21:04, Alex Boisvert wrote: > > > Hi Mathias, > > > > I just fixed this in trunk. I hadn't tested with package(:javadoc). > > Thanks for reporting. > > > > alex > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Mathias <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Just a short heads-up: > >> > >> Issue 520 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-520) is marked > as > >> "resolved" in JIRA, however, with the current trunk snapshot it's not > >> possible to have Buildr generate scaladoc against Scala 2.8.1. > >> The trace shows that the "doc-title" option is correctly set, however > the > >> old "-windowtitle" option is also present, which causes scaladoc to exit > >> with an error instead of actually building the documentation. > >> > >> Could you reopen issue 520? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Mathias > >> --- > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.parboiled.org > >> > >> > >
