Okay, I've just pushed a change that makes it possible to add more sections to the generated pom. Look here ( https://github.com/jvshahid/buildr-dependency-extensions/wiki/pom_customization) for an example. This should make it possible to customize the generated pom so that it works with sonar.
FYI. I've also changed the way version conflicts are resolved to be consistent with maven, that is versions higher in the dependency graph win. If two different versions were found at the same depth the higher version wins. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, John Shahid <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/17/11, Peter Donald <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:03 AM, John Shahid <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Feel free to open issues on github, I'll be happy to discuss it with > you. > >> The problem I have now is that my use cases of the extension are > limited, > >> I > >> just want transitive dependencies and pom generation. I want more people > >> to > >> start using the extension and tell me what gaps they'd like to fill to > >> make > >> the transition to Buildr easier. > > > > One thing I would like to see, but don't have the time to contribute > > to make it happen atm is the ability to build enough of a pom to run > > the project through sonar (http://www.sonarsource.org/). That would be > > great! :) > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Peter Donald > > >
