Hi Alex > ... meaning that we should make appropriate artifact changes so they are > resolve from the scala-tools release repository. I am working on it. After having changed all occurences, rake spec started fine, but needs some time to finish. If everything is okay I will atach the patch today or tomorrow.
Best regards Niklaus > > If you could to tweak your patch to achieve this, otherwise attach it as-is > and I'll take it from there. > > alex > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisv...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Ideally we should only rely on > > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/scala-tools/ and make sure we > > don't depend on snapshots by default. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Niklaus Giger < > > > > niklaus.gi...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I opened the bug BUILD-647 as I noticed that "rake spec" did not work > >> anymore. > >> > >> Replacing everywhere 'http://scala-tools.org/repo-snapshots' by > >> 'https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots' made the specs > >> pass > >> again. (see attached patch) > >> > >> I am however not sure whether we should use sometimes > >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/scala-tools/ in place of > >> http://scala-tools.org/repo-snapshots. > >> > >> Using only https://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/scala-tools/ is not > >> sufficient to make the specs pass. > >> > >> If you like the patch I will add it to the bug report and grant the > >> Apache Foundation all the needed rights. > >> > >> Best regards > >> > >> -- > >> Niklaus Giger -- Niklaus Giger
