Thanks for putting the gist together.  The test step failed trying to
retrieve an older version
of ScalaTest.

Here is the output:

[tony@starship 3188848]$ ~/tools/buildr-1.4.7/bin/buildr clean test
/home/tony/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/buildr-1.4.7/lib/buildr/core/application.rb:596:
Use Rbfig.
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require': iconv will
be deprecate
(in /home/tony/work/git/3188848, development)
Cleaning buildr-flatspec
Testing buildr-flatspec
Compiling buildr-flatspec into /home/tony/work/git/3188848/target/classes
Downloading org.scalatest:scalatest_2.9.:jar:1.6.1
Buildr aborted!
RuntimeError : Failed to download org.scalatest:scalatest_2.9.:jar:1.6.1,
tried the fol
http://scala-tools.org/repo-releases/
http://scala-tools.org/repo-snapshots/
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/

Thanks!
Tony

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisv...@gmail.com>wrote:

> FlatSpec extends org.scalatest.Suite so it should be picked up as well.
>
> I've just tested it locally with a small project and it works as expected.
>
> I've created a gist that you can download/clone
> https://gist.github.com/3188848 to try out.
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Anthony Bargnesi <abargn...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a project in scala that I'm attempting to test with
> > buildr/ScalaTest.  It is configured like:
> >
> >
> > define 'scala.project' do
> >     require 'buildr/scala'
> >     Buildr.settings.build['scala.version'] = "2.9.1"
> >     test.using :scalatest
> >     compile.using :target => '1.5'
> >     compile.with SCALA_TEST
> >     package(:jar, :id => PICKUP + 'scala.project').with \
> >             :manifest => file(MANIFEST),
> >             :meta_inf => file(SPRING_META)
> >
> > end
> >
> >
> >
> > I have two org.scalatest.FlatSpec specification tests that I want to
> > run.  I ran "buildr test" and "buildr test --trace" and did not see
> > these tests run.
> >
> >
> > The documentation says that ScalaTest's org.scalatest.Suite classes
> > will be picked up, but what about the FlatSpec classes?
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tony
> >
>

Reply via email to