Can you extrapolate on what you mean by this? I thought I was using persistent queues, but what makes you think that, that should solve this issue?
Thank you. Bruno Borges wrote: > > Maybe you should use a persistent queue, for later processing. > > > Bruno Borges > blog.brunoborges.com.br > +55 21 76727099 > > "The glory of great men should always be > measured by the means they have used to > acquire it." > - Francois de La Rochefoucauld > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:47 PM, yesnid <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hello All, >> >> My router is becoming blocked by sending messages to a queue on which no >> one >> is taking messages from the queue, when the queue becomes full, the >> router >> is blocked waiting for more space in the queue to become free, any ideas >> about how I could get around this? In my application it is possible that >> applications listening to queues may come up and down for a shortwhile so >> I >> can't just simply purge a queue when there are no consumers. Also If I >> wait >> for the queue to become completely full before taking action it causes a >> sort of cascade effect causing others to rapidly fill up as well. >> >> Thank you for the input, in advance. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Router-Blocked-by-full-Destination-Route-Queue-tp22981898p22981898.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> > > > ----- > Bruno Borges > blog.brunoborges.com.br > +55 21 76727099 > > "The glory of great men should always be > measured by the means they have used to > acquire it." > - Francois de La Rochefoucauld > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Router-Blocked-by-full-Destination-Route-Queue-tp22981898p23012024.html Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
