Hi,

I'll doing this with a Processor like the following :


public void process(Exchange exchange)  throws Exception  {
 try
        {
            String uri =
exchange.getIn().getHeader(org.apache.camel.component.http.HttpProducer.HTTP_URI).toString();

              // Modify the URI here


            ProducerTemplate<Exchange> template =
exchange.getContext().createProducerTemplate();

            Exchange exch = template.send(MY_END_POINT, exchange);
       }
catch(Throwable th)
      {
       th.printStackTrace();
     }

Is my code correct or I'm missing something ?
Thanks

Mustapha


On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Willem Jiang <[email protected]>wrote:

> How about write a processor to take out the myProperty from exchange and
> set it into the message header?
> You will get the full control of the exchange and message in that
> processor.
>
> Willem
>
>
> Nasim Anza wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to set the URI of an http endpoint using a dynamic property
> but
> > it doesn't work.
> >
> > I've tried the following DSL code:
> >
> > *from("direct:myEndPoint")
> >  .setProperty("myProperty").xpath("//MyProperty", String.class) //This
> value
> > is defined in input XML
> >
>  
> .setProperty("uriParameter").constant(MyHelper.getParameterValue("${property.myProperty}"))
> > //The value depends on the previous property value (myProperty)
> >
>  .setHeader(org.apache.camel.component.http.HttpProducer.HTTP_URI).simple("
> > http://myserver?dynamicParam=${property.uriParameter}<http://myserver?dynamicParam=$%7Bproperty.uriParameter%7D>
> ")
> > *....
> >
> > My URI depends on the dynamicParam which depends on the value of the
> > property "myProperty" set by the user in the SOAP request.
> >
> > The MyHelper is a class that defines a static method "static String
> > getParameterValue(String propertyValue)" which returns a string value
> > depending on a given property value.
> >
> > It seems very simple to do it in java but more complex with Camel DSL!
> >
> > Can someone helps me.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Mustapha
> >
>
>

Reply via email to