On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ryan Gardner<[email protected]> wrote:
> I would suggest @deprecating it for the 2.0 release and work to remove them
> all by 2.1 (or even if they were all removed, a .t least let users have some
> time to make the migration)

Well its now we have the time to do it as its a new major release.
Going for 1.x to 2.0.
I would *not* like to have a lot of @deprecated methods in a central
class such as ProducerTemplate
and having them around until Camel 2.5/3.x comes along. And having to
add 10x new methods to a ever growing list
of methods. We already have to many in this class.

So its now or wait till next major release.


>
> On Jun 10, 2009 3:12 AM, "Claus Ibsen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I just did a quick grep for "AndHeader" in unit tests.
> We use it 554 times. So it will affect many files if we do a rename.
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Ryan Gardner<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The requestBody method makes sense (it requests a body) - but >
> "requestBodyAndHeader" and "reques...
> --
>
> Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration:
> http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davs...
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer

Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus

Reply via email to