Hi,
I would like to know if the following routes are equivalent in term of
transaction/rollback strategy (for file component, DB insert/update, ...)
when they are linked using direct endpoint or without ? More precisely I
would like to know if direct endpoint is a cosmetic one or made some
restrictions on transaction propagation, error handling, ... ?
from(file)
.transacted()
.doTry()
.to(beanA)
.to(beanB)
.to(directAA)
.doCatch()
.exception()
.to(log)
.rollback()
from(directAA)
.doTry()
.to(beanC)
.to(beanD)
.to(QueueZZ)
.doCatch()
.exception()
.to(log)
.rollback() // if error occurs during bean process execution (C, D) then
rollback is done on bean A, B, C, D and file is not deleted
OR
from(file)
.transacted()
.doTry()
.to(beanA)
.to(beanB)
.to(directAA)
.to(beanC)
.to(beanD)
.to(QueueZZ)
.doCatch()
.exception()
.to(log)
.rollback()
Could they be written in an equivalent way ?
Regards,
Charles Moulliard
Senior Enterprise Architect
Apache Camel Committer
*****************************
blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
