Isn't the activemq uuid generator a lot faster ? On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 13:37, James Strachan <james.strac...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/10/16 Martin Krasser <d...@martin-krasser.de>: >> >> I'm trying to get camel-core running on Google App Engine. It doesn't run >> out-of-the-box mainly because Camel's UUID generator. It uses InetAddress >> that is not on the JRE class whitelist. Replacing the implementation using >> Java's UUID class, I got a simple route running. >> >> Is there any special reason why Camel doesn't use Java's UUID class for >> generating IDs? Do you see any issues replacing the current implementation? > > No, it should work with the UUID class AFAIK. Our own UUID generator > is mostly a hang-over from JDK 1.4 and ActiveMQ - I don't see any > issues yet with using java.util.UUID. If we hit any we could make it > pluggable - but for simplicity maybe we should just switch? > >> I'll summarize other issues with Camel on GAE in a separate post. > > Great! > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
