Thks. I will try.

Charles Moulliard
Senior Enterprise Architect
Apache Camel Committer

*****************************
blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard



On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Dmitry Ulanov <dula...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In Java Objects are comared via equals() method, not toString(). I usually
> use Jakarta Lang libarary to automate it. For example:
>
> import java.io.Serializable;
>
> import org.apache.commons.lang.builder.EqualsBuilder;
> import org.apache.commons.lang.builder.HashCodeBuilder;
> import org.apache.commons.lang.builder.ToStringBuilder;
> import org.apache.commons.lang.builder.ToStringStyle;
>
> public abstract class AbstractParent<T extends AbstractParent> implements
> Serializable {
>
>    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
>   �...@override public boolean equals(Object obj) {
>        return EqualsBuilder.reflectionEquals(this, obj);
>    }
>
>   �...@override public int hashCode() {
>        return HashCodeBuilder.reflectionHashCode(this);
>    }
>
>   �...@override public String toString() {
>        return ToStringBuilder.reflectionToString(this,
> ToStringStyle.MULTI_LINE_STYLE);
>    }
> }
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Charles Moulliard 
> <cmoulli...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I have customized the toString method of each Class. What is strange
>> is that in another the test generating the same objects, it works.
>>
>> I will adapt the test to compare object differently.
>>
>> Charles Moulliard
>> Senior Enterprise Architect
>> Apache Camel Committer
>>
>> *****************************
>> blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>> twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > If you are comparing objects it will use equals and it may not be able
>> > to detect that they are identical.
>> >
>> > If they have a nice toString you can convert them to String and do a
>> > string equals.
>> >
>> > At least their to string output in this mail looks as if they are
>> identical.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Moulliard <cmoulli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Unit test return the following error :
>> >>
>> >> java.lang.AssertionError: mock://result Body of message: 0.
>> >>
>> >> Expected:
>> >>
>> >> <[{org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Header=Model :
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Header, FIX 4.1,
>> >> 20, 10, INVMGR, BRKR,
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Order=Model :
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Order, BE.CHM.001,
>> >> CHM0001-01, 4, BE0001245678, 1, this is a camel - bindy test,
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Trailer=Model :
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Trailer, 220}]>
>> >>
>> >>  but was:
>> >>
>> >> <[{org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Header=Model :
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Header, FIX.4.1,
>> >> 20, 10, INVMGR, BRKR,
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Order=Model :
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Order, BE.CHM.001,
>> >> CHM0001-01, 4, BE0001245678, 1, this is a camel - bindy test,
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Trailer=Model :
>> >> org.apache.camel.dataformat.bindy.model.fix.simple.Trailer, 220}]>
>> >>
>> >> I don't understand why test fail because comparison of both is the same
>> !!!
>> >>
>> >> Here is the method used to compare what I receive :
>> >> result.expectedBodiesReceived()
>> >>
>> >> result = result endpoint
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Charles Moulliard
>> >> Senior Enterprise Architect
>> >> Apache Camel Committer
>> >>
>> >> *****************************
>> >> blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>> >> twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Claus Ibsen
>> > Apache Camel Committer
>> >
>> > Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
>> > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to